Welcome to Open4Success

You are visitor

Tux, the Happy Linux Penguin -- Rex Ballard

Open Source + Open Mind = Unlimited Abundance

Subject: Re: Linux is secure???
From: Rex Ballard
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:51:52 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy

This is a well-known, and well documented issue.  Note that the default configuration installation of nearly every Linux distribution uses a different FTP, which is more secure.

When you install WU-FTP, there are several warnings and cautions about setting up anonymous FTP accounts, particularly the importance of setting up one read-only directory, and another write-only directory (even a contributor can't see his own freshly 'put' file.

This is similar to the "RSH" panic.

There are a number of tools which are designed for the back-end nodes of beowulf clusters, which are protected by front-end gateway machines which function as very aggressive firewalls to the back-end nodes.  Several good books and articles which discuss how to build a Beowulf also discuss these security issues.

Yes, if you are very intentional about it, you can deliberately configure your Linux system to be totally insecure.  But it takes some real effort.

This is in contrast to Windows 95, 98, and ME which allow public shares to cable modems and DSL links, IE with embedded ActiveX controls, or Outlook that is configured by default to open Visual Basic files and execute .exe files.

Michel Pizaz wrote:

WU-FTP flaw

http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220011217mco01.htm