-- Rex Ballard Tux, the Happy Linux Penguin The BSD Daemon

Rex's Blog

Visitor: 184

Welcome to Open4Success

Open Source + Open Mind = Unlimited Abundance

How the Web Was Won

How the Web Was Won

  • Parent Directory Subject: Re: LANDMARK BRAINWASHING From: SamOLSamOL@aol.com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:05:27 -0400
  • Subject: Re: LANDMARK BRAINWASHING From: SamOLSamOL@aol.com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:05:33 -0400
  • Subject: Re: LANDMARK BRAINWASHING From: samolsamol@aol.com Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 20:47:57 -0400
  • Subject: T-rex & INTERNET (LANDMARK) From: SamOLSamOL@aol.com Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 18:36:44 -0400
  • How the Web Was Won

    Subject: Re: LANDMARK BRAINWASHING

    From: SamOLSamOL@aol.com

    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 02:59:35 -0400


    Status: RO
    X-Status: 
    
    Rex...
    
    Regarding this:
    
    No, Rex...I don't want more details.  As someone who has participated in est
    and LEC for twenty years, who has been a Seminar Leader and an Advanced
    Course leader, etc. etc., I don't need details...especially details that are
    filled with inaccuracies (as your posts have been) regardless of the well
    meaning intent that underlies them.
    
    What I was *hoping* is that you would *hear* and be *responsive to* the
    concerns that I expressed regarding your communication which, given your
    response, you clearly did not.
    
    It seems now obvious to me that you will have to learn *for yourself* how
    your speaking affects others...particularly people who have not participated
    with Landmark.  I will, therefore, leave you in *their* listening.
    
    
    I want to apologize for being such a brute (or bitch...choose whichever).  I
    meant what I said; however, I'm not at all happy about the way I said it.   I
    really do understand that you have nothing but good intentions when you speak
    about these matters.  And it is and was not my intention to "squash" you in
    the process of dealing with some of the things that you said.
    
    In the matter of my responses to your posts on the newsgroup, what I really
    attempted to do, the success of which (or not) is really irrelevant, is to
    point out (before anyone else did) aspects of your communications that did
    not work.  I'm pretty sure that if I had not spoken first, the response to
    your posts would have been much more brutal than mine were.
    
    I think you have a lot to contribute.  And I would not sleep well tonight if
    I did not at least make some attempt to let you know that, while I stand by
    my opinion that your communications have some flaws, I *do* know that your
    heart is in the right place and, after all, that is what is important.  We
    all have to make mistakes as we learn to speak effectively about the things
    that are important to us.
    
    So, whether or not you accept my apology for my e-mail response to you,
    please do know that I have extended it authentically and wholeheartedly.
    
    Warm regards,
    Sam
    
    
    
    From SamOLSamOL@aol.com Sun Apr  7 00:44:23 1996
    Received: from emout07.mail.aol.com (emout07.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.22]) by cnj.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA03324 ; for ; Sun, 7 Apr 1996 00:44:22 -0500